![Walid Jumblatt (L), the Druze former leader of Lebanon's Progressive Socialist Party (PSP), shakes hands with Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) leader Ahmed al-Sharaa (also known as Abu Mohammad al-Jolani) (R) during a visit to Damascus on December 22, 2024. [AFP via Getty Images]](https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/12/GettyImages-2190410175.jpg)
Walid Jumblatt has held four distinct positions on the Washington framework agreement in sixty days. He has called it a capitulation, declared neutrality, labelled it a trap, and announced his support. The conventional reading is that this represents inconsistency, opportunism, or the erratic behaviour of an aging political operator who has lost his strategic compass. This reading is wrong. Jumblatt’s shifts are the most precise instrument for reading the actual balance of power in Lebanon at any given moment, precisely because they are not driven by conviction. They are driven by calculation. And the calculation reveals more about the structural dynamics of the framework’s viability than any official statement, diplomatic communique, or expert assessment produced in the last two months. […]
